Search for: "Sportradar, US" Results 1 - 20 of 24
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 May 2012, 9:39 am
Anyway, the Bird & Bird media release runs like this: "Online Sports Data Company not liable for use of Goal statistics from UK football matches  The English [and Welsh] High Court has handed down judgment in the Football Dataco Limited & Others v Sportradar GMBH and Sportradar AG database right infringement case. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 1:18 am
The defendants, Sportradar, were a German company and its Swiss parent. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 2:03 am
These include Football Dataco v Sportradar GmbH & Sportradar AG, C-173/11, and Peter Pammer v Reederei Karl Sclüter GmbH & Co.KG, C-585/08. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 1:34 am by Brad Spitz
The fact that the agreements take into consideration the amount business in the UK to fix the remuneration would constitute additional evidence of Sportradar’s knowledge of the destination of the data. - The fact that the data was accessible in English to UK Internet users (who were clients of the companies in question), whereas English is not commonly used in the Member States from which Sportradar pursues its activities. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 1:34 am by Kluwer Blogger
The fact that the agreements take into consideration the amount business in the UK to fix the remuneration would constitute additional evidence of Sportradar’s knowledge of the destination of the data. - The fact that the data was accessible in English to UK Internet users (who were clients of the companies in question), whereas English is not commonly used in the Member States from which Sportradar pursues its activities. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 7:13 am by Guido Westkamp
Sportradar GmbH and Ors regarding a question where the use of the content of a database protected by sui generis database right takes place. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 3:24 am
Before us the parties deployed considerable arguments in support of their respective positions. [read post]
31 Aug 2013, 11:38 am by Andres
A Comparative Analysis of German and US Law Tim Engelhardt, pp.149-176 | HTML | PDF | Internationalisation of FOSS Contributory Copyright Assignments and Licenses: Jurisdiction-Specific or “Unported”? [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 7:02 pm by Yosi Yahoudai
. ___ The Associated Press created this story using technology provided by Data Skrive and data from Sportradar. [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 11:45 am by John Enser
This Blogger would suggest the answer that (i) after SportRadar  and Svensson the Court will find that the continued protection of rights that are not contemplated under the Database Directive is not compatible with the harmonisation principle of the Directive but that (ii) a Member State court should therefore not in any event deny the protection of Article 15 to a user of a database, regardless of whether that Directive is protected under the Directive, or under separate… [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 7:02 pm by Yosi Yahoudai
Gohlke scored 12 second-half points. ___ The Associated Press created this story using technology provided by Data Skrive and data from Sportradar. [read post]
3 May 2013, 1:46 am
You might want to consider possible overlaps (and points of conflict) between the various provisions, such as permitted uses of orphan works ...] [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 5:10 am by Marie Louise
Football Dataco Ltd, The Scottish Premier League Limited, The Scottish Football League Limited and PA Sport UK Limited v Sportradar GmbH & and Sportradar AG (IPKat) EWHC (Ch): Of access and excess: security for wizard costs: Allen (trustee of Adrian Jacobs) v Bloomsbury Publishing Ltd and J. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 8:33 am by Graham Smith
  They said much the same for use of a trade mark in L’Oreal v eBay. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 3:07 am
Does the defendant's activity fall within the scope of fair use? [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 8:00 pm
Instead it gave face to both the referring court and the AG by constantly using the term of “copyright infringement”. [read post]
1 Mar 2014, 3:37 pm by Barry Sookman
McIntyre Machinery, Ltd v Nicastro131 S.Ct. 2780 (2011), Football Dataco Ltd. v Sportradar GmbH, Case C‑173/11, 18 October, 2012. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 2:59 am by Marie Louise
The People) (Recording Industry vs The People) Viacom – YouTube should not be required to use software filters, Public Knowledge tells Court: Viacom v YouTube (Public Knowledge) (Electronic Frontier Foundation) US Trade Marks & Domain Names – Decisions District Court N D Georgia: Trademark owner gets injunction against keyword ad campaign that generated no sales for the advertiser: InternetShopsInc.com v. [read post]